Website Migration Notice: SafePoint is now operated by CyberServal.Learn more β†’
DiscussionSLA

[Feature Request] JWT Claim Extraction for Rate Limiting

Published a month ago

# SafeLine WAF
# πŸ’‘ feature
# ❓ question
# πŸ’ͺ improve

Published a month ago

profile_photo

homag

Updated a month ago

0

[Feature Request] JWT Claim Extraction for Rate Limiting

Use case:
We have a mobile API where every request includes an Authorization: Bearer <JWT> header. The JWT contains claims like user_id, client_id, and device_id that uniquely identify the client/user/device.

IP-based rate limiting is not effective for our case because:

  • Mobile clients share IPs via NAT or carrier-grade NAT
  • A single malicious user can abuse the API without triggering IP-based limits
  • We need to block/rate-limit specific users or devices, not entire IP ranges

Concrete scenario:
Our API endpoints have configurable rate limits per client. A specific client_id may exceed the allowed number of requests within a given time window. SafeLine currently cannot identify this as a violation because it only tracks by IP β€” so the backend receives all requests and gets overloaded. We want SafeLine to return HTTP 429 once the threshold is exceeded for that client_id.

What we need:
The ability to extract a specific claim from the JWT payload (e.g. sub, user_id, client_id, device_id) and use it as the rate-limit key in SafeLine's rate limiting configuration.

Fallback request:
If full JWT parsing is complex to implement, we'd also be satisfied with the ability to rate-limit based on a custom request header value, such as:

  • X-Client-Id
  • X-Device-Id
  • X-RateLimit-Key

This would allow us (or our API Gateway) to forward the relevant identifier as a plain header, and SafeLine would use it as the rate-limit key.

Why this matters:
The goal is to offload rate limiting and early filtering to the WAF layer, reducing load on the API Gateway. Without this feature, JWT-aware rate limiting must be handled deeper in the stack, defeating the purpose of having a WAF in front.

This is a very common requirement for mobile-first and API-first architectures. Would love to see this on the roadmap!

profile_photo

Carrie

Updated a month ago

0

Hi <@789901523466846209> Yes, JWT parsing is complex and can introduce additional security risks.
So we'll not implement JWT claim-level rate limiting.
But we are considering a more generic capability to use extracted request fields as rate-limiting keys, but it has not yet been scheduled.